Subject	Nah, not that fast >>>
Posted by	Jackie Chan (Z-less) on April 26, 2002 at 3:20 PM
	This message has been viewed 69 times.
In Reply To	ask Jackie Chan. I think he ran pretty fast with stock N/A. (n/m) posted by ZWEEDZ on April 26, 2002 at 03:08 PM
Message	15.7@93mph was my best run, BUT that's with a bad 60ft, bald tires and shot rear shocks (all of which I've fixed). The 93mph for a bone stock NA was what I was impressed with; with a 2.0 60 ft, I could have run a high 14 stock. My NA was stronger than most.
Follow Ups	What is the fastest 1/4 mi. a N/A 2+2 you've heard of get? - NismoDHS 14:35:08 04/26/02 here you go >>> - odysseus(cleveland) 14:39:54 04/26/02 Do you know what the 1/4 mile is stock? (n/m) - NismoDHS 14:57:27 04/26/02 ask Jackie Chan. I think he ran pretty fast with stock N/A. (n/m) - ZWEEDZ 15:08:47 04/26/02 Nah, not that fast >>> - Jackie Chan (Z-less) 15:20:12 04/26/02 yours was just in good running condition. (n/m) - 91FaIrLaDyZ 15:24:02 04/26/02 damn, that's fast. - ZWEEDZ 15:07:35 04/26/02 Yes! Launch is everything. (n/m) - Jackie Chan (Z-less) 15:21:12 04/26/02 where can I find the big pic of that Z in your sig? - TomGreen 15:27:19 04/26/02 stock is 15.0-whenever. (n/m) - 91FaIrLaDyZ 15:22:31 04/26/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.